Thursday, April 30, 2020

Facing Facts

What follows is an after dinner talk I gave ten years ago to a group of academics at Capital University in Columbus, Ohio. I'd been asked to offer some reflections on an exhibition in Capital's Schumacher Gallery concerning the lives of Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee.
On my c.v. it appears as "Robert E. Lee and U. S. Grant in Public and Private Memory," but I had already posted it on a blog I once maintained entitled “Facing the Demon: A Personal Account of Managing Bipolar Disorder.” I had entitled the blog post “Facing Facts,” and I use that title here.
I dislike giving presentations that don't build toward projects underway, and since the next speaking engagements on the horizon would have to do with mental health advocacy, I decided this would be a good opportunity to experiment with one. The talk was something of a high wire act, interweaving personal observations of Grant and Lee with those concerning bipolar disorder. But judging by the response I received, it worked.
***
It’s a pleasure to talk with you this evening about Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant, particularly in light of the exhibition at the Schumacher Gallery. I’ve heard it said that an exhibition, even when installed, is not really an exhibition. It becomes one only people come to experience it. They see in it, and take from it, meanings that the designers of the exhibition did not necessarily intend to impart. This is so because people bring to it their own experiences of life, their own concerns, and above all their own imaginations. Were this not the case, I doubt if exhibits would be at all worth the investment of time, money, and energy required to create them.
During the Civil War a pair of Union officers climbed atop a mountain to survey through telescopes the Confederate encampment beneath them. They saw soldiers brewing coffee, writing letters, reading newspapers, and washing clothes. To one of the officers this was a revelation. “My God, Adjutant,” he said to the other. “They’re human beings, just like us!” The Grant-Lee exhibition invites us to reconsider these two icons of the American military tradition, these central characters in the American Iliad. Their lives had the same common place experiences and the same complexities as our own. They were human beings, just like us.
I grew up with Grant and Lee. I got to know them through children’s books, and particularly got to know Lee through a biography entitled Robert E. Lee and the Road of Honor, written for young people by the Southern progressive journalist Hodding Carter, which I read at the age of eight. But the really critical experience occurred when I was twelve and first read A Stillness at Appomattox, Bruce Catton’s brilliant evocation of the epic struggle between these two commanders in the Civil War’s final year. When I say that I grew up with Grant and Lee I mean this, of course, in an imaginative sense, and yet the imaginations of the young can be so vivid and intense that I still sometimes feel as if I grew up with them in a literal sense. And in terms of their impact on my life, that is quite likely true in the deepest sense of truth.
Recently I turned fifty years old. That makes me just seven years younger than was Lee in 1864 and actually eight years older than Grant when he led the Army of the Potomac across the Rapidan River and into battle against Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. My life has gone in directions very different from theirs and has taken a very different shape. But in dealing with the challenges of my life, I have often looked back on these two men, both what I thought I knew of them as a youth and what I think I know of them now.
The biggest challenge that has faced me in life began to confront me in 1986, when I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder — what used to be called manic depression. For reasons I’ll explain in a bit, it has become important to me to talk about what it is like to live with the disorder, but at the time it was something that I simultaneously acknowledged and ignored, with an odd kind of doublethink that, I have discovered, is not uncommon with people confronting facts that are unavoidable and yet still something one wishes to avoid. For the first few months I saw a psychiatrist and took medications, but then I simply stepped away from that and for eleven years thought and lived as if bipolar disorder were something I had in theory, not in fact.
A hypomanic episode I had at age 38 finally brought me to reality. With hypomania a person can be charismatic, unusually creative, and brilliantly high functioning. But those who know them well recognize that something Is wrong. And if the person is wise, so does he. So early one morning, refreshed and wide awake after only two hours of sleep — notwithstanding the fact that given the pace I’d been keeping and the sleeping pill I’d taken I should have been out cold — I came to realize, and I mean really realize, that I had bipolar disorder and always would have it and was lucky during the preceding decade not to have met with disaster. I sat down at my computer and composed a sort of memorandum to myself. I’m going to read some of it here. At first it will seem to have no relevance to Grant or Lee, but then it will take a turn that should surprise you. It certainly did me.


Wednesday, April 29, 2020

How I Spent My Semester from Hell - Pt 1

About a week ago, one of my hardy little band of readers inquired about the long drought of entries. The explanation, as one might suppose, was the COVID-19 emergency.
My doctor actually had me tested for the virus last Friday, and the result came back negative. This was the result I expected, because at no point had I experienced the tell tale symptoms of fever, dry cough, and shortness of breath.
But I sure as hell had been experiencing *something*-- indeed, a seemingly endless stream of different *somethings* -- which finally prompted my physician to investigate the off chance that the coronavirus was using me as a human guinea pig to try out several inventive new ways by which to afflict a human being.
And yet my semester, which for me commenced on Wednesday, January 8, had begun auspiciously. I was teaching two mid-level undergraduate courses, each of which quickly developed that welcome rapport with students that makes coming to class a pleasure for one and all.
Then things began to suck. Bigly.
On Tuesday, March 3, I emailed my department chair: “My daughter had a fever last week and I had to cancel class in order to care for her. I’ve come down with something myself and just now sent word to my students and TA that I will need to cancel class today. I thought I would let you know so that you would not get any misimpressions via the rumor mill.” (The misimpressions being that probably I was canceling class because I was clinically depressed.)
Within minutes a sympathetic response landed in my in-box.
The following day I sent him an update: “I’m still sick and have had to cancel class again. This is very frustrating. I will compensate for the missing lectures by placing materials online. Just wanted to keep you informed.”
Another sympathetic response, with additional information that a lot of faculty were in the same boat.
A few minutes later it occurred to me that I was sick enough that I would likely have to cancel class yet again and therefore: “Looking ahead, given that next week is Spring Break, I think it may be best to proactively cancel my two remaining classes for the week and re-group. I dislike not having direct interaction with my students, but I can use Carmen to offset the loss of class time.”
Sounds good, the chair replied.
As it turned out, I had to use Carmen for a hell of a lot more than to offset the loss of class time. Because on Monday, March 9, the first three cases of COVID-19 in Ohio were confirmed and late that evening the university announced that face-to-face classes would be suspended, at least until March 30, and when classes resumed next Monday, after the conclusion of Spring Break, they would resume in online format.